Immunefi has paid out $100M+ in bug bounties. Smart contract audits prevent bugs from reaching production. These are not the same thing — and confusing them has cost projects hundreds of millions.
| Feature | Immunefi Bug Bounties | SmartContractAuditor.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Timing | Post-deployment (reactive) | Pre-deployment (proactive) |
| Coverage | Only what researchers submit | Systematic scan of all code |
| Cost model | Pay per bug found | Flat fee / subscription |
| Ongoing protection | ✓ Continuous | Re-scan on code changes |
| Researcher quality | ✓ Top global talent | AI + pattern matching |
| Guaranteed review | No — depends on interest | ✓ Always runs |
| Business logic flaws | ✓ Researchers find these | Partial coverage |
| Prevents pre-launch bugs | ✗ | ✓ |
Immunefi Bug Bounties Cost
$10,000 – $10,000,000 per payout
Immunefi Bug Bounties Timeline
Ongoing (reactive)
AI Audit Cost
Free – $100/mo
AI Audit Timeline
< 60 seconds
A bug bounty program (typically run on Immunefi, HackerOne, or self-hosted) pays external researchers to find vulnerabilities in your live code. Researchers are incentivized to look because they get paid per finding.
Immunefi is the dominant platform in crypto with $100M+ paid out to date. The top researchers are world-class — the same people who find bugs in Ethereum itself. But they only look at what's in production, and they only report bugs if it's financially worth their time.
For a protocol with $100M TVL and a $1M max bounty, researchers are highly motivated. For a $500k TVL protocol with a $10k max bounty, most top researchers won't bother.
A smart contract audit — whether manual or AI-powered — systematically reviews code before deployment. The goal is to find and fix vulnerabilities before they're exploitable.
Audits cover:
AI auditing catches these classes automatically in under 60 seconds. Manual audits add researcher judgment on top of automated scanning.
Security-conscious protocols use both tools in sequence:
Skipping step 1 and 2 and only running a bug bounty is like skipping fire prevention and relying entirely on fire insurance. The Poly Network exploit proves the point.